WWW.THESIS.DISLIB.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Online materials, documents
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 11 | 12 || 14 | 15 |   ...   | 25 |

«Commission Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter; IRS Employer File Number State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or ...»

-- [ Page 13 ] --

Coal Combustion Byproduct Disposal In May 2010, the EPA released a proposed rule to regulate the management and disposal of coal combustion byproducts, presenting two alternatives to regulation under the RCRA. Under the first option, coal combustion byproducts would be regulated as special waste under RCRA Subtitle C and the EPA would establish requirements for coal combustion byproducts from the point of generation to disposition, including the closure of disposal units. Alternatively, the EPA is considering regulation under RCRA Subtitle D under which it would establish minimum nationwide standards for the disposal of coal combustion byproducts. Under both options, surface impoundments utilized for coal combustion byproducts would have to be cleaned and closed unless they could meet more stringent regulatory requirements; in addition, more stringent requirements would be implemented for new ash landfills and expansions of existing ash landfills. The public comment period closed in November 2010. The EPA has indicated the rule will be finalized by December 19, 2014; however, at this time, the substance of the final rule is not known. In briefs filed in litigation pending in the D.C. Circuit to force the EPA to meet a deadline to issue final coal combustion byproduct rules, the EPA indicated it needs until at least the end of 2014 to review comments, formulate a risk assessment and coordinate the rule with the effluent limit guidelines. Efforts have continued in the United States Congress to pass legislation precluding the EPA from regulating coal combustion byproducts as a hazardous waste under RCRA Subtitle C; however, to date, none of these efforts have resulted in legislation passing both houses of the United States Congress.

PacifiCorp operates 16 surface impoundments and six landfills that contain coal combustion byproducts. These ash impoundments and landfills may be impacted by the newly proposed regulation, particularly if the materials are regulated as hazardous or special waste under RCRA Subtitle C, and could pose significant additional costs associated with ash management and disposal activities at PacifiCorp's coal-fueled generating facilities.

The impact of the proposed regulations on coal combustion byproducts cannot be determined at this time; however, PacifiCorp has begun developing surface impoundment and landfill compliance plan options to ensure that physical infrastructure decisions are aligned with the potential outcomes of the rulemaking. It is believed that the EPA will, in its final rulemaking, continue to allow the beneficial use of ash. An assessment released in February 2014 by the EPA indicates that encapsulated beneficial reuse of coal ash in concrete and wallboard products is acceptable after concluding the potential for release of hazardous constituents was at or below levels for products not containing coal ash. In the event that beneficial use is precluded, PacifiCorp will incur increased disposal costs and reduced revenues from the sale of ash, though such impacts are not anticipated to be material as long as the final rules allow disposal under Subtitle D.

Other

Other laws, regulations and agencies to which PacifiCorp is subject include, but are not limited to:

• The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and similar state laws may require any current or former owners or operators of a disposal site, as well as transporters or generators of hazardous substances sent to such disposal site, to share in environmental remediation costs.

• The federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and similar state statutes establish operational, reclamation and closure standards that must be met during and upon completion of mining activities.

• The FERC evaluates hydroelectric systems to ensure environmental impacts are minimized, including the issuance of environmental impact statements for licensed projects both initially and upon relicensing. The FERC monitors the hydroelectric facilities for compliance with the license terms and conditions, which include environmental provisions.

Refer to Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding the relicensing of PacifiCorp's Klamath River hydroelectric system.

PacifiCorp expects that it will be allowed to recover the prudently incurred costs to comply with the environmental laws and

regulations discussed above. PacifiCorp's planning efforts take into consideration the complexity of balancing factors such as:

(a) pending environmental regulations and requirements to reduce emissions, address waste disposal, ensure water quality and protect wildlife; (b) avoidance of excessive reliance on any one generation technology; (c) costs and trade-offs of various resource options including energy efficiency, demand response programs and renewable generation; (d) state-specific energy policies, resource preferences and economic development efforts; (e) additional transmission investment to reduce power costs and increase efficiency and reliability of the integrated transmission system; and (f) keeping rates as affordable as possible. Due to the number of generating units impacted by environmental regulations, deferring installation of compliance-related projects is often not feasible or cost effective and places PacifiCorp at risk of not having access to necessary capital, material and labor while attempting to perform major equipment installations in a compressed timeframe concurrent with other utilities across the country. Therefore, PacifiCorp has established installation schedules with permitting agencies that coordinate compliance timeframes with construction and tie-in of major environmental compliance projects as units are scheduled off-line for planned maintenance outages; these coordinated efforts help reduce costs associated with replacement power and maintain system reliability.





Collateral and Contingent Features

Debt and preferred securities of PacifiCorp are rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of PacifiCorp's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt or preferred securities. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time. As of December 31, 2013, PacifiCorp's credit ratings for its senior secured debt and its issuer credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from the three recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.

PacifiCorp has no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. PacifiCorp's unsecured revolving credit facilities do not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level in order to draw upon their availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facilities are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities.

Certain authorizations or exemptions by regulatory commissions for the issuance of securities are valid as long as PacifiCorp maintains investment grade ratings on senior secured debt. A downgrade below that level would necessitate new regulatory applications and approvals.

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the three recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance" in the event of a material adverse change in PacifiCorp's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2013, PacifiCorp would have been required to post $236 million of additional collateral. PacifiCorp's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors. Refer to Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of PacifiCorp's collateral requirements specific to PacifiCorp's derivative contracts.

In July 2010, the President signed into law the Dodd-Frank Reform Act. The Dodd-Frank Reform Act reshapes financial regulation in the United States by creating new regulators, regulating markets and firms not previously regulated, and providing new enforcement powers to regulators. Virtually all major areas of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act are and have been subject to extensive rulemaking proceedings being conducted both jointly and independently by multiple regulatory agencies, many of which have been completed and others that are expected to be finalized in 2014.

PacifiCorp is a party to derivative contracts, including over-the-counter derivative contracts. The Dodd-Frank Reform Act provides for extensive new regulation of over-the-counter derivative contracts and certain market participants, including imposition of position limits, mandatory clearing, exchange trading, capital, margin, reporting, recordkeeping and business conduct requirements.

Many of these requirements are primarily for "swap dealers" and "major swap participants," but many of these also impose some requirements on almost all market participants, including PacifiCorp. The Dodd-Frank Reform Act provides certain exemptions from many of these requirements for commercial end-users when using derivatives to hedge or mitigate commercial risk of their businesses. PacifiCorp qualifies or believes it will qualify for many of these exemptions. PacifiCorp generally does not enter into over-the-counter derivative contracts for purposes unrelated to hedging or mitigating commercial risk and has determined that it is not a swap dealer or major swap participant. The outcome of pending and remaining Dodd-Frank Reform Act rulemaking proceedings cannot be predicted but requirements resulting from these proceedings could directly impact PacifiCorp or could have impacts to energy and other markets in general that could have an impact on PacifiCorp's consolidated financial results.

Limitations In addition to PacifiCorp's capital structure objectives, its debt capacity is also governed by its contractual and regulatory commitments.

PacifiCorp's revolving credit and other financing agreements contain customary covenants and default provisions, including a covenant not to exceed a specified debt-to-capitalization ratio of 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. Management believes that PacifiCorp could have borrowed an additional $7.6 billion as of December 31, 2013 without exceeding this threshold.

Any additional borrowings would be subject to market conditions, and amounts may be further limited by regulatory authorizations or by covenants and tests contained in other financing agreements.

The state regulatory orders that authorized the acquisition by MEHC contain restrictions on PacifiCorp's ability to pay common dividends to the extent that they would reduce PacifiCorp's common stock equity below specified percentages of defined capitalization. As of December 31, 2013, the most restrictive of these commitments prohibits PacifiCorp from making any distribution to MEHC or PPW Holdings without prior state regulatory approval to the extent that it would reduce PacifiCorp's common stock equity below 44% of its total capitalization, excluding short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt.

The terms of this commitment treat 50% of PacifiCorp's remaining balance of preferred stock in existence prior to the acquisition of PacifiCorp by MEHC as common equity. As of December 31, 2013, PacifiCorp's actual common stock equity percentage, as calculated under this measure, was 54.1%, and management believes that PacifiCorp could have declared a dividend of $2.6 billion under this commitment.

These commitments also restrict PacifiCorp from making any distributions to either PPW Holdings or MEHC if PacifiCorp's senior unsecured debt is rated BBB- or lower by Standard & Poor's Rating Services or Fitch Ratings or Baa3 or lower by Moody's Investor Service, as indicated by two of the three rating services. As of December 31, 2013, PacifiCorp met the minimum required senior unsecured debt ratings for making distributions.

Inflation

Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where PacifiCorp operates have not had a significant impact on PacifiCorp's consolidated financial results. PacifiCorp operates under a cost-of-service based rate structure administered by various state commissions and the FERC. Under this rate structure, PacifiCorp is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation. PacifiCorp attempts to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances.

There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

PacifiCorp from time to time enters into arrangements in the normal course of business to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties that involve guarantees or similar arrangements. PacifiCorp currently has indemnification obligations for breaches of warranties or covenants in connection with the sale of certain assets. In addition, PacifiCorp evaluates potential obligations that arise out of variable interests in unconsolidated entities, determined in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 11 | 12 || 14 | 15 |   ...   | 25 |


Similar works:

«Groundwater Protection: Reflecting Progress & Responding to the Future Event Handbook: Agenda Abstracts & Bios List of Attendees Chase Park Plaza Hotel St. Louis, Missouri Acknowledgements: Event Sponsors and Contributors Thank you for caring about Groundwater!Major Funding Provided by: Monday, September 23 7:00 Registration and Morning Reception -Groundwater Protection: Reflecting Progress & Responding to the Future 8:00–10:00 Lindell C&D Mike Paque, Executive Director, GWPC (Moderator)...»

«NFMA Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference Tuesday, April 17th 7:00 – 8:00 p.m.Welcome Reception: Sponsored by National Public Finance Guarantee.Wednesday April 18th: 7:30 – 8:15 a.m. Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:15 – 8:30 a.m. Welcoming Remarks – Gregory Aikman, CFA, Vice President, BNY Mellon Wealth Management, NFMA Chairman • David Belton, Head of Municipal Bond Research, Standish Mellon Asset Management, and Geoffrey Buswick, Managing Director, Standard & Poor’s Ratings...»

«BRIEFING PAPER Number 05572, 8 April 2016 Capital gains tax : recent By Antony Seely developments Inside: 1. The origins of the current tax structure 2. CGT and the new 50p rate of income tax 3. Debate on CGT reform after the 2010 Election 4. The Coalition Government’s reforms 5. The Conservative Government’s reforms 6. Annex: CGT statistics www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | papers@parliament.uk | @commonslibrary Number 05572, 8 April 2016 2...»

«NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is not citable as precedent. It is a public record. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 05-3301 FELIX PUENTE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent. DECIDED: July 10, 2006 Before GAJARSA, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and PROST, Circuit Judge. PROST, Circuit Judge. Felix Puente was arrested and indicted for assaulting his wife. Mr. Puente plead nolo contendere to a reduced...»

«BRIEFING PAPER Number 05094, 12 January 2016 Air passenger duty: recent debates and By Antony Seely reform Inside: 1. The rise in aviation emissions 2. The June 2010 Budget 3. Budget 2011: proposals to reform APD 4. Discussion of the tax burden 5. Budget 2014: a new 2 band structure 6. Recent developments 7. Appendix: APD rates since www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | papers@parliament.uk | @commonslibrary Number 05094, 12 January 2016 2 Contents...»

«Photo by Wayne Kirby Fulton Alliance Church 1044 State Route 48, Fulton, NY 13069 Pastoral Staff Rev. J Spurling, Senior Pastor Tyler Sant, Pastor of Student Ministries Virginia Standford – Office Administrator “But I do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning those who have fallen asleep, lest you sorrow as others who have no hope. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who sleep in Jesus. For this we say to you by the word of the...»

«APPLICANT REFERENCE FORM South University Anesthesiologist Assistant Program 709 Mall Boulevard Savannah, GA 31406 Phone (912) 201-8083 Fax (912) 790-4199 TO THE APPLICANT: Complete the following information and send it to the person who has agreed to complete it for you. Include a stamped envelope addressed to the Program Office at the above address. APPLICANT’S NAME: _DATE: REFERENCE’S NAME NOTE TO APPLICANT AND REFERENCE REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY: Under the Family Educational Rights...»

«Boys & Girls Club of Any Town Board Development Plan Deerbrook Project Governance Committee Ronnie Jenkins REJ 2012 Role of the Governance Committee Perhaps the most important committee in the entire organization is the Governance Committee. This Committee is charged with the responsibility of recruiting and developing interested individuals to the Board of Directors and its standing committees who will use their abilities and resources to ensure that the Boys & Girls Club of the Coastal Empire...»

«ChAPTER FoUR chargeS and PenalTieS I. the NatUre of charges A provisions of the Civil Service Reform Act, 5 USC 7513, requires “at least 30 days’ advance written notice, unless there is reasonable cause to believe the employee has committed a crime for which a sentence of imprisonment may be imposed, stating the specific reasons for the proposed action.” The statute also provides the right to appeal for individuals whose cases are within the jurisdiction of MSPB, and a determination by...»

«DRAFT MINUTES DASB SENATE MEETING Wednesday, November 23rd, 2011 3:30 PM Conference Room B Call to Order Arvind Ravichandran called the meeting to order at 3:34pm Roll Call Excused Present Absent Late Left Early Cristian Omar Aguilar X Mustafa Arshad X X3:47 Adrian Asbun X Monica Carrillo X3:35 Carolyn Chen X Victor Chien X X Nelson Chuang X Susan Chuang X Amira Farah X Anastasia Inez X Madina Jahed X Sana Kathuria X Nicholas Lacroix X X3:35 Ernest L.W. Linous X Shahar Marom X Orit Mohamed X...»

«Manteca, California March 10, 2015 The Board of Directors of the South San Joaquin Irrigation District met in regular session at the District headquarters at 9:00 a.m. Vice President Kuil called the meeting to order and led the flag salute. Upon roll call the following members were noted present: DIRECTORS: HOLBROOK HOLMES KAMPER KUIL ROOS ABSENT: NONE Also present were General Manager Jeff Shields, General Counsel Steve Emrick, Engineering Department Manager Sam Bologna, and Executive...»

«Propagation of partial randomness Kojiro Higuchi Department of Mathematics and Informatics Faculty of Science, Chiba University 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage, Chiba, JAPAN khiguchi@g.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp W. M. Phillip Hudelson One Oxford Center, Suite 2600 301 Grant Street Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA phil.hudelson@gmail.com Stephen G. Simpson Department of Mathematics Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802, USA http://www.math.psu.edu/simpson simpson@math.psu.edu Keita Yokoyama School of...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2017 www.thesis.dislib.info - Online materials, documents

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.