FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Online materials, documents

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 16 | 17 || 19 | 20 |   ...   | 36 |

«As filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2016 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. ...»

-- [ Page 18 ] --

Please see the table “Obligations Due by Period” below for more information on Ryanair’s long-term debt (including current maturities) and finance leases as of March 31, 2016. See also Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 for further information on the maturity profile of the interest rate structure and other information on the Company’s borrowings.

At March 31, 2016, 194 of the aircraft in Ryanair’s fleet had been financed through loan facilities with various financial institutions active in the structured export finance sector and supported by a loan guarantee from Ex-Im Bank.

Each of these facilities takes essentially the same form and is based on the documentation developed by Ryanair and Ex-Im Bank, which follows standard market forms for this type of financing. In November 2010, Ryanair financed seven aircraft through a U.S. dollar-denominated Ex-Im Bank Capital Markets Product (“Eximbond”). The Eximbond has essentially the same characteristics as all previous Ex-Im Bank guaranteed financings with no additional obligations on Ryanair. On the basis of an Ex-Im Bank guarantee with regard to the financing of up to 85% of the eligible U.S. and foreign content represented in the net purchase price of the relevant aircraft, the financial institution investor enters into a commitment letter with the Company to provide financing for a specified number of aircraft benefiting from such guarantee; loans are then drawn down as the aircraft are delivered and payments to Boeing become due. Each of the loans under the facilities are on substantially similar terms, having a maturity of 12 years from the drawdown date and being secured by a first priority mortgage in favor of a security trustee on behalf of ExIm Bank.

Through the use of interest rate swaps or cross currency interest rate swaps, Ryanair has effectively converted a portion of its floating-rate debt under its financing facilities into fixed-rate debt. Approximately 32% of the loans for the aircraft acquired under the above facilities are not covered by such swaps and have therefore remained at floating rates linked to EURIBOR, with the interest rate exposure from these loans largely hedged by placing a similar amount of cash on deposit at floating interest rates. The net result is that Ryanair has effectively swapped or drawn down fixed-rate euro-denominated debt with maturities of between seven and twelve years in respect of approximately 68% of its outstanding aircraft debt financing at March 31, 2016 and approximately 18% of total debt was floating rate at that date.

The table below illustrates the effect of swap transactions (each of which is with an established international financial counterparty) on the profile of Ryanair’s total outstanding debt at March 31, 2016. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Interest Rate Exposure and Hedging” for additional details on the Company’s hedging transactions.

–  –  –

The weighted-average interest rate on the cumulative borrowings under these facilities of €4,023.0 million at March 31, 2016 was 1.97%. Ryanair’s ability to obtain additional loans pursuant to each of the facilities to finance the price of future Boeing 737-800 and Boeing 737-MAX-200 aircraft purchases is subject to the issuance of further bank commitments and the satisfaction of various contractual conditions. These conditions include, among other things, the execution of satisfactory documentation, the requirement that Ryanair perform all of its obligations under the Boeing agreements and provide satisfactory security interests in the aircraft (and related assets) in favor of the lenders and ExIm Bank, and that Ryanair not suffer a material adverse change in its conditions or prospects (financial or otherwise).

In addition, as a result of the Company obtaining a BBB+ (stable) credit rating from Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings and following Ryanair’s issuance of €850.0 million in 1.875% unsecured Eurobonds with a 7 year tenor in June 2014 and issuance of €850.0 million in 1.125% unsecured Eurobonds with an 8 year tenor in March 2015 under its EMTN program, the Company may decide in the future to issue additional debt from capital markets to finance future aircraft deliveries. As part of its Ex-Im Bank guarantee-based financing of the Boeing 737-800s, Ryanair has entered into certain lease agreements and related arrangements. Pursuant to these arrangements, legal title to the 194 aircraft delivered and remaining in the fleet as of March 31, 2016 rests with a number of United States special purpose vehicles (the “SPVs”). The SPVs are the borrowers of record under the loans made or to be made under the facilities, with all of their obligations under the loans being guaranteed by Ryanair Holdings.

These Aircraft are financed using a standard Ex-Im Bank “orphan” ownership structure. The shares of the SPVs (which are owned by an unrelated charitable association and not by Ryanair) are in turn pledged to a security trustee in favor of Ex-Im Bank and the lenders. Ryanair operates each of the aircraft pursuant to a finance lease it has entered into with the SPVs, the terms of which mirror those of the relevant loans under the facilities. Ryanair has the right to purchase the aircraft upon termination of the lease for a nominal amount. Pursuant to this arrangement, Ryanair is considered to own the aircraft for accounting purposes under IFRS. Ryanair does not use special purpose entities for off-balance sheet financing or any other purpose which results in assets or liabilities not being reflected in Ryanair’s consolidated financial statements. In addition to its purchase option under the finance lease, Ryanair is entitled to receive the balance of any proceeds received in respect of the aircraft that remain after Ex-Im Bank and the lenders are paid what they are owed under the loan guarantees.

Ryanair has a track record in securing finance for similar sized aircraft purchases. The 1998, 2002, 2003 and 2005 Boeing Contracts totaling 348 aircraft were financed with approximately 66% U.S. Ex-Im Bank loan guarantees and capital markets (with 85% loan to value) financing, 24% through sale and operating leaseback financing, and 10% through Japanese operating leases with call options (“JOLCOs”). See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” Under the Aviation Sector Understanding which came into effect from January 1, 2013, the fees payable to Ex-Im Bank for the provision of loan guarantees have significantly increased, thereby making it more expensive than more traditional forms of financing. As a result, Ryanair intends to finance the New Aircraft obtained under the 2013 and 2014 Boeing Contracts through a combination of internally generated cash flows, debt financing from commercial banks, debt financing through the capital markets in a secured and unsecured manner, JOLCOs and sale and operating leasebacks. These forms of financing are generally accepted in the aviation industry and are currently widely available for companies who have the credit quality of Ryanair. Ryanair may periodically use Ex-Im Bank loan guarantees when appropriate. Ryanair intends to finance pre-delivery payments (“Aircraft Deposits”) to Boeing in respect of the New Aircraft via internally generated cash flows similar to all previous Aircraft Deposit payments.

At March 31, 2016, Ryanair had 43 operating lease aircraft in the fleet. As a result, Ryanair operates, but does not own, these aircraft, which were leased to provide flexibility for the aircraft delivery program. Ryanair has no right or obligation to acquire these aircraft at the end of the relevant lease terms. 9 leases are denominated in euro and require Ryanair to make fixed rental payments over the term of the lease. The remaining 34 operating leases are U.S.

dollar-denominated and require Ryanair to make fixed rental payments. The Company has an option to extend the initial period of seven years on 23 of the 43 remaining operating lease aircraft as at March 31, 2016 on pre-determined terms. In addition to the above, the Company financed 30 of the Boeing 737-800 aircraft delivered between March 2005 and March 2014 with 13-year euro-denominated JOLCOs. 26 of these JOLCO arrangements are still outstanding as of March 31, 2016. These structures are accounted for as finance leases and are initially recorded at fair value on the Company’s balance sheet. Under each of these contracts, Ryanair has a call option to purchase the aircraft at a predetermined price after a period of 10.5 years, which it may exercise. Ryanair exercised this option for four of these aircraft in fiscal year 2015. Six aircraft have been financed through euro-denominated 12-year amortizing commercial debt transactions.

Since, under each of the Company’s operating leases, the Company has a commitment to maintain the relevant aircraft, an accounting provision is made during the lease term for this obligation based on estimated future costs of major airframe, engine maintenance checks and restitution of major life limited parts by making appropriate charges to the income statement calculated by reference to the number of hours or cycles operated during the year.

Under IFRS, the accounting treatment for these costs with respect to leased aircraft differs from that for aircraft owned by the Company, for which such costs are capitalized and amortized.

Ryanair currently has corporate ratings of BBB+ (stable) from both Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings and a €3 billion EMTN program. Ryanair issued €850.0 million in unsecured Eurobonds with a 7 year tenor at a coupon of 1.875% in June 2014 and €850.0 million in unsecured Eurobonds an 8 year tenor at a coupon of 1.125% in March 2015 under this program that are guaranteed by Ryanair Holdings. The Company used the proceeds from these issuances for general corporate purposes.

Contractual Obligations. The table below sets forth the contractual obligations and commercial commitments of the Company with definitive payment terms, which will require significant cash outlays in the future, as of March 31, 2016. These obligations primarily relate to Ryanair’s aircraft purchase and related financing obligations, which are described in more detail above, and do not reflect the Eurobond issuances in June 2014 and March 2015. For additional information on the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments, see Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 18.

The amounts listed under “Finance Lease Obligations” reflect the Company’s obligations under its JOLCOs.

See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects⎯ Liquidity and Capital Resources.” The amounts listed under “Purchase Obligations” in the table reflect obligations for aircraft purchases and are calculated by multiplying the number of aircraft the Company is obligated to purchase under its current agreements with Boeing during the relevant period by the Basic Price for each aircraft pursuant to the relevant contract, with the dollar-denominated Basic Price being converted into euro at an exchange rate of $1.1385 = €1.00 (based on the European Central Bank Rate on March 31, 2016). The relevant amounts therefore exclude the effect of the price concessions granted to Ryanair by Boeing and CFM, as well as any application of the Escalation Factor described below. As a result, Ryanair’s actual expenditures for aircraft during the relevant periods will be lower than the amounts listed under “Purchase Obligations” in the table.

With respect to purchase obligations under the terms of the 2013 Boeing Contract and 2014 Boeing Contract, the Company was required to pay Boeing 1.0% of the Basic Price of each of the 283 firm-order Boeing 737 aircraft at the time the contracts were signed (such deposit being fully refundable if the Company had not received the shareholder approval at the EGMs on June 18, 2013 and November 28, 2014), and will be required to make periodic advance payments of the purchase price for each aircraft it has agreed to purchase during the course of the two-year period preceding the delivery of each aircraft. As a result of these required advance payments, the Company will have paid up to 30% of the Basic Price of each aircraft prior to its delivery (including the addition of an estimated “Escalation Factor” but before deduction of any credit memoranda and other concessions); the balance of the net price is due at the time of delivery. Similar terms applied under the 2005 Boeing contract, with the first payment due when the contract was signed in February 2005.

The amounts listed under “Operating Lease Obligations” reflect the Company’s obligations under its aircraft operating lease arrangements.

–  –  –

(a) For additional information on Ryanair’s long-term debt obligations, see Note 11 and Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 18.

(b) These are noted at a non-discounted “list” price.

(c) In determining an appropriate methodology to estimate future interest payments we have applied either the applicable fixed rate or currently applicable variable rate where appropriate. These interest rates are subject to change and amounts actually due may be higher or lower than noted in the table above.


Ryanair uses certain off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of business, including financial guarantees and operating lease commitments. Details of each of these arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources are discussed below.

Operating Lease Commitments. The Company has entered into a number of sale-and-leaseback transactions in connection with the financing of a number of aircraft in its fleet. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Resources” above for additional information on these transactions.

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 16 | 17 || 19 | 20 |   ...   | 36 |

Similar works:

«Language, Music, and the Brain A Mysterious Relationship Strüngmann Forum Reports Julia Lupp, series editor The Ernst Strüngmann Forum is made possible through the generous support of the Ernst Strüngmann Foundation, inaugurated by Dr. Andreas and Dr. Thomas Strüngmann. This Forum was supported by funds from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Science Foundation) and the Stiftung Polytechnische Gesellschaft Language, Music, and the Brain A Mysterious Relationship Edited by Michael...»

«Geometric Surface Processing via Normal Mapsa Tolga Tasdizen Ross Whitaker Paul Burchard Stanley Osher Univ. of Utah Univ. of Utah UCLA UCLA tolga@cs.utah.edu whitaker@cs.utah.edu burchard@pobox.com sjo@math.ucla.edu UUCS-02-03 a Submitted to SIGGRAPH’02 for review as a research paper. School of Computing University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA January 17, 2002 Abstract The generalization of signal and image processing to surfaces entails filtering the normals of the surface, rather...»

«CISTERCIAN STUDIES SERIES: NUMBER TWO HUNDRED TWELVE Smaragdus of Saint-Mihiel COMMENTARY ON THE RULE OF SAINT BENEDICT CisterCian studies series: number two Hundred twelve Smaragdus of Saint-mihiel CommenTary on The rule of saint benedict Translated by David Barry osb Introductory Essays by Terrence Kardong osb Jean Leclercq osb Daniel M. LaCorte CISTERCIAN PUBLICATIONS Kalamazoo, Michigan © Translation, copyright, Cistercian Publications, 2007 All rights reserved Smaragdus of Saint-Mihiel,...»

«Copyright c 1996 Stephen Scott Richardson and Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Neither the author nor the Institute shall be held responsible for any injuries or liabilities caused by errors or omissions in this text. You use information in this text at your own risk. No warranties are expressed or implied. No part of this document may be reproduced without written permission from the author who may be contacted at prefect@gweep.net ALL COPYRIGHTS AND REGISTERED TRADEMARKS BELONG TO THEIR...»


«Case: 15-14551 Date Filed: 12/07/2016 Page: 1 of 35 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 15-14551 D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cv-02723-JSM-TGW UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff AppelleeCross Appellant, versus ST. JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL, INC., Defendant AppellantCross Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court from the Middle District of Florida _ (December 7, 2016) Case: 15-14551 Date Filed: 12/07/2016 Page: 2 of 35...»

«equineline.com Pedigree 07/24/13 11:10:41 EDT Muneera Chestnut Mare; Jan 20, 1995 Northern Dancer, 61 b Flaming Page, 59 b Nijinsky II, 67 b *Val de Loir, 59 b Green Dancer, 72 b Muneera *Green Valley II, 67 dk b/ Sly Pola, 57 ch Foaled in Kentucky Bold Ruler, 54 dk b Raja Baba, 68 b Missy Baba, 58 b Hard Knocker, 83 ch Round Table, 54 b Homespun, 69 b Gal I Love, 59 ch By GREEN DANCER (1972). 2nd Hwt. in England and France, Classic winner of $315,722 USA in England and France, Poule d'Essai...»

«The determinants of unsecured borrowing: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey Ana Del-Rio* and Garry Young** Draft Working Paper * Banco de España. Alcalá, 50. 28014 Madrid, Spain E-mail: adelrio@bde.es ** Financial Stability, Bank of England, Threadneedle Street, London, EC2R 8AH. E-mail: garry.young@bankofengland.co.uk The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and not necessarily those of the Bank of England or Banco de España. We are grateful for helpful...»

«The Value of Relationship Banking During Financial Crises: Evidence from the Republic of Korea by Giovanni Ferri a, Tae Soo Kang b, and In-June Kim c Abstract A systemic financial crisis cum monetary restriction is probably the most promising event to assess whether and to what extent relationship banking is valuable to borrowers. We take this question to a unique database of credit bureau micro-information covering the pervasive financial crisis Korea experienced during 1997-98. Specifically,...»

«Attachment C March 8, 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of ) ) FIRST ENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. ) Docket No. 50-346-LRA ) (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1) ) NRC STAFF AFFIDAVIT OF ABDUL H. SHEIKH CONCERNING INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO AMEND MOTION FOR ADMISSION OF CONTENTION NO. 5 Abdul H. Sheikh does hereby state as follows: 1. I am employed as a Senior Structural Engineer in the Division of License...»

«Munich Personal RePEc Archive The Nature of Poverty and Its Prospects: Pakistan Evidence Gobind M. Herani and Pervez Wasim and Allah Wasayo Rajar and Riaz Ahmed Shaikh Indus Institute of, Karachi University, Sindh University, BIZTEK Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/11615/ MPRA Paper No. 11615, posted 18. November 2008 05:28 UTC The Nature of Poverty and Its Prospects: Pakistan Evidence Gobind M. Herani*, Pervez Wasim**, Allah Wasayo Rajar*** and Riaz Ahmed Shaikh**** ABSTRACT This...»


<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2017 www.thesis.dislib.info - Online materials, documents

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.